[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] On-demand device probing
On 26 October 2015 at 11:51, Michael Turquette <> wrote:
> Quoting Rafael J. Wysocki (2015-10-25 06:54:39)
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:06 AM, Mark Brown <> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 04:17:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >
>> >> Well, I'm not quite sure why exactly everyone is so focused on probing here.
>> >
>> > Probe deferral is really noisy even if it's working fine on a given
>> > system so it's constantly being highlighted to people in a way that
>> > other issues aren't if you're not directly having problems.
>> >
>> > There's also the understanding people had that the order things get
>> > bound changes the ordering for some of the other cases (perhaps it's a
>> > good idea to do that, it seems likely to be sensible?).
>> But it really doesn't do that. Also making it do so doesn't help much
>> in the cases where things can happen asynchronously (system
>> suspend/resume, runtime PM).
>> If, instead, there was a way to specify a functional dependency at the
>> device registration time, it might be used to change the order of
>> everything relevant, including probe. That should help to reduce the
>> noise you're referring to.
> Taking it a step further, if functional dependencies were understood at
> link-time then we could optimize link order as well. There are probably
> lots of optimizations if we only made the effort to understand these
> dependencies earlier.
> Constructing the device/resource dependency graph before the device ever
> boots sounds interesting to me.

Alexander Holler has been looking at that for some time already.



> Regards,
> Mike
>> If the dependency could only be discovered at the probe time, the
>> order of things might be changed in response to letting the driver
>> core know about it rather than "just in case", which should be more
>> efficient.
>> Thanks,
>> Rafael
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to
> More majordomo info at
> Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-26 14:01    [W:0.162 / U:1.872 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site