lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Should audit_seccomp check audit_enabled?
From
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
> I would argue that, if auditing is off, audit_seccomp shouldn't do
> anything. After all, unlike e.g. selinux, seccomp is not a systemwide
> policy, and seccomp signals might be ordinary behavior that's internal
> to the seccomp-using application. IOW, for people with audit compiled
> in and subscribed by journald but switched off, I think that the
> records shouldn't be emitted.
>
> If you agree, I can send the two-line patch.

I think signr==0 states (which I would identify as "intended
behavior") don't need to be reported under any situation, but audit
folks wanted to keep it around.

-Kees

--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-23 19:21    [W:0.081 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site