lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH -next] mtd: fsl-quadspi: Never build on SPARC
From
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:13 PM, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 06:07 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
>>
>> + Han
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 07:31:46AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> Attempts to build fsl-quadspi on SPARC fail with
>>>
>>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c: In function 'fsl_qspi_init_lut':
>>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c:369:1: error:
>>> 'LUT_0' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c:418:1: error:
>>> pasting "LUT_" and "(" does not give a valid preprocessing token
>>> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c:418:2: error:
>>> implicit declaration of function 'LUT_'
>>
>>
>> I don't think this is only a SPARC problem. The macro concatenation is
>> generally suspect.
>>
>> I see that READ and WRITE are problems at least. If something like
>> <linux/fs.h> gets included somehow, then these tokens resolve to
>> integers or expressions before they fall through to literal
>> concatentation, so we get 'LUT_0' or 'LUT_(1ULL << __REQ_WRITE)' instead
>> of 'LUT_READ' and 'LUT_WRITE'.
Hi Brian
We have two options, either undef READ and WRITE before these macros
or change the LUT_READ to LUT_FSLREAD and same as WRITE. So what's
your opinion? Thanks.
>>
> You are right, that deserves a better fix. I'll leave it up to you.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-23 19:01    [W:0.189 / U:0.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site