lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] locks: cleanup posix_lock_inode_wait and flock_lock_inode_wait
Hi Benjamin,

[auto build test WARNING on jlayton/linux-next -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]

url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Benjamin-Coddington/locks-introduce-locks_lock_inode_wait/20151022-233848
reproduce:
# apt-get install sparse
make ARCH=x86_64 allmodconfig
make C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)

>> fs/locks.c:1176:5: sparse: symbol 'posix_lock_inode_wait' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> fs/locks.c:1863:5: sparse: symbol 'flock_lock_inode_wait' was not declared. Should it be static?

Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-22 19:01    [W:0.257 / U:0.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site