lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.3-rc6] proc: fix oom_adj value read from /proc/<pid>/oom_adj
[CC David as well]

The original patch has been posted here:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/65a10261038346b1a778443fd15f0980%40SHMBX01.spreadtrum.com

On Tue 20-10-15 12:27:58, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Hongjie Fang (方洪杰)" <Hongjie.Fang@spreadtrum.com> writes:
>
> > The oom_adj's value reading through /proc/<pid>/oom_adj is different
> > with the value written into /proc/<pid>/oom_adj.
> > Fix this by adding a adjustment factor.
>
> *Scratches my head*
>
> Won't changing the interpretation of what is written break existing
> userspace applications that write this value?

No, because they will see the same value they wrote. The current state
is broken because you get a different value than you wrote.

I am just wondering, how have you found this problem? Code review or
have you encountered a real failure because of this?

> Added a few more likely memory management suspects that might understand
> what is going on here.
>
> Eric
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hongjie Fang <hongjie.fang@spreadtrum.com>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> > index b25eee4..1ea0589 100644
> > --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> > +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> > @@ -1043,6 +1043,7 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > int oom_adj;
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int err;
> > + int adjust;

This doesn't need the function visibility.

> >
> > memset(buffer, 0, sizeof(buffer));
> > if (count > sizeof(buffer) - 1)
> > @@ -1084,8 +1085,10 @@ static ssize_t oom_adj_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > */
> > if (oom_adj == OOM_ADJUST_MAX)
> > oom_adj = OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX;
> > - else
> > - oom_adj = (oom_adj * OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX) / -OOM_DISABLE;
> > + else{

space after else and checkpatch will probably complain about missing { }
for if...

Other than that the patch looks good to me. The changelog coul be
slightly improved as well.

> > + adjust = oom_adj > 0 ? (-OOM_DISABLE-1) : -(-OOM_DISABLE-1);
> > + oom_adj = (oom_adj * OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MAX + adjust) / -OOM_DISABLE;
> > + }
> >
> > if (oom_adj < task->signal->oom_score_adj &&
> > !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) {
> >
> > --
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-21 12:01    [W:0.047 / U:0.496 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site