Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:28:32 +0900 | From | Yoshinori Sato <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: bad base of the h8300 tree |
| |
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:57:43 +0900, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:21:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > On Sat, 3 Oct 2015 14:28:38 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > > > It is now based on next-20150925. As I have said before, you cannot > > > base your linux-next included branch on a linux-next release. You > > > should either base it on Linus' tree, or one of the other linux-next > > > included branches (as long as that other branch is never rebased). > > > > OK, now your tree is no longer based on a linux-next release (thanks). > > However, you have managed to rebase a whole string of post v4.3-rc5 > > commits from Linus' tree into your tree. This would mean that we would > > end up with duplicates of those patches. Please just rebase your > > patches (and just your patches) onto some part of Linus' tree. > > And now that you have merged in v4.3-rc6, just do a "git rebase > v4.3-rc6", please (you still have duplicates of some of the patches in > Linus' tree between -rc5 and -rc6. >
OK. Fixed.
> -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
-- Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
| |