Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:12:56 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices | From | Jan Blunck <> |
| |
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 6:02 PM, David Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote: >> >> >> I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses. >> This is one example with a team device: > > > for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local addresses. >
That is interesting. As far I can see you are setting IFF_SLAVE in do_vrf_add_slave() and therefore already stop IPv6 addrconf.
| |