lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] USB: serial: cp210x: Workaround for cp2108 failure due to GET_LINE_CTL bug
    On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:11:12AM -0500, Konstantin Shkolnyy wrote:
    > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> wrote:
    > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 06:23:31PM -0500, Konstantin Shkolnyy wrote:
    > >> cp2108 GET_LINE_CTL returns the 16-bit value with the 2 bytes swapped.
    > >> However, SET_LINE_CTL functions properly. When the driver tries to modify
    > >> the register, it reads it, modifies some bits and writes back. Because the
    > >> read bytes were swapped, this often results in an invalid value to be written.
    > >> In turn, this causes cp2108 respond with a stall. The stall sometimes doesn't
    > >> clear properly and cp2108 starts responding to following valid commands also
    > >> with stalls, effectively failing.
    > >
    > > That sounds weird. Are you saying that all or only some cp2108 devices
    > > would be affected by this? And only for the line-control register?
    >
    > The bug exists in all current cp2108 devices and affects only
    > GET_LINE_CTL. But it may be fixed in a future revision.

    Ok, have you some kind of confirmation from silabs on this already?

    > >> @@ -343,6 +344,10 @@ static int cp210x_get_config(struct usb_serial_port *port, u8 request,
    > >> return result;
    > >> }
    > >>
    > >> + /* Workaround for swapped bytes in 16-bit value from CP210X_GET_LINE_CTL */
    > >> + if (spriv->swap_get_line_ctl && request == CP210X_GET_LINE_CTL && size == 2)
    > >> + swab16s((u16 *)data);
    > >> +
    > >
    > > If we determine we need this, then it should probably be isolated to a
    > > dedicated line-control helper function.
    >
    > I feel that you want to kill cp210x_get_config. I can easily see why
    > you don't like it :-) I'll gladly replace all
    > "cp210x_get_config(GET_LINE_CTL)" calls with a new
    > "cp210x_get_line_ctl" helper if you don';t mind.

    That would be great.

    > [...]
    > >> + port = serial->port[0];
    > >>
    > >> spriv = kzalloc(sizeof(*spriv), GFP_KERNEL);
    > >> if (!spriv)
    > >> return -ENOMEM;
    > >>
    > >> + /* get_config and set_config rely on this spriv field */
    > >> cur_altsetting = serial->interface->cur_altsetting;
    > >> spriv->bInterfaceNumber = cur_altsetting->desc.bInterfaceNumber;
    > >>
    > >> + /* Detect CP2108 bug and activate workaround.
    > >> + * Write a known good value 0x800, read it back.
    > >> + * If it comes back swapped the bug is detected.
    > >> + */
    > >> +
    > >> + /* The following get_config won't swap the bytes */
    > >> + spriv->swap_get_line_ctl = false;
    > >> +
    > >> + /* must be set before calling get_config and set_config */
    > >> usb_set_serial_data(serial, spriv);
    > >>
    > >> + line_ctl = 0x800;
    > >> +
    > >> + err = cp210x_set_config(port, CP210X_SET_LINE_CTL, &line_ctl, 2);
    > >
    > > Calling port functions before the ports have been fully initialised
    > > isn't very nice, even if it works for this driver. This should probably
    > > be done in a helper function that accesses this register directly (and
    >
    > So usb_control_msg should be fine to call here, right?

    Yes.

    > > perhaps also avoids overwriting the default setting).
    >
    > You mean save and restore the register setting around this bug detection?

    Precisely. The driver currently reads out the default settings and
    updates it's terminal settings accordingly. I'm sure 8N1 is likely the
    default setting, but let's keep the current behaviour for now in case we
    end up having to backport this fix as well (arguably, these devices have
    never been supported so that may not be necessary).

    Thanks,
    Johan


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-10-16 17:41    [W:3.826 / U:0.088 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site