Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:21:18 +0530 | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 4/5] cpufreq: create cpu/cpufreq/policyX directories |
| |
On 15-10-15, 12:25, Saravana Kannan wrote: > Btw, does a Review-by have an implicit Acked-by?
I have attended a session at Linaro Connect where this was discussed and the answer was:
Acked-by: is more of a general agreement from the person that he is fine with the patch, but he might not have done a very careful review and he isn't really responsible for the patch's content.
Reviewed-by: is a more strict tag and implies that the reviewer has reviewed it at his best and he is as much responsible for the content of the patch as the author.
> Kinda unrelated to this patch, but shouldn't this function undo the > symlinks is has created so far before returning? Otherwise, we'd be > leaving around broken symlinks.
Hmm, yeah. Will fix it separately.
-- viresh
| |