Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: Add new boards to bcm4708 DT bindings | From | Scott Branden <> | Date | Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:59:31 -0700 |
| |
On 15-10-15 01:52 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 10/15/2015 12:14 AM, Jon Mason wrote: >> Add the 4708, 4709, and 953012k SVKs to the the documentation for the >> Broadcom Northstar device tree bindings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt >> index 6b0f49f..b9cc308 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt >> @@ -5,4 +5,11 @@ Boards with the BCM4708 SoC shall have the following properties: >> >> Required root node property: >> >> +bcm94708 this should be bcm4708 > > I thought we wanted to add the SoC names here, isn't bcm94708 a board > the bcm4708, the SoC ion this board? I do not really care about this > file, has anyone found the documentation what should be listed here?
Yes - the 9 infront indicates its some type of board. The SoC part numbers should be listed here. The SoCs are all variants of Northstar/Northstar plus family. Some have different io, packaging, speed grades, etc.
> > Hauke > >> compatible = "brcm,bcm4708"; >> + >> +bcm94709 This should be bcm4709 >> +compatible = "brcm,bcm4709"; >> + >> +bcm953012 This should be bcm53012 >> +compatible = "brcm,bcm53012"; >> >
| |