Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] spmi-pmic-arb: support configurable number of peripherals | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Date | Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:43:56 -0700 |
| |
On 09/15/2015 11:27 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 09/15, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 18:28 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 09/14/2015 02:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>>> The current driver implementation supports only 128 peripherals. >>>> Add support for more than 128 peripherals by taking a lazy >>>> caching approach to the mapping tables. Instead of reading the >>>> tables at boot given some fixed size, read them on an as needed >>>> basis and cache the results. We still assume a max number of 512 >>>> peripherals, trading off some space for simplicity. >>>> >>>> Based on a patch by Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org> and >>>> Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> >>>> --- >>> Hi Ivan, >>> >>> This patch causes 8916 to crash, because there isn't a mapping for ppid >>> 257 in the ppid to channel table. It seems that we're reading the revid >>> from the slave id 1 pmic by going through channel 0, which seems to be >>> setup for ppid 9 (slave id 0 and the peripheral starting at 0x900). Can >>> we stop reading the revid registers from non-zero slave id pmic devices? >>> That would be one solution to fix this problem. Or maybe we need to >>> special case this in the pmic arbiter code to fold ppid 0xN01 (slave id >>> N and address 0x100) onto channel 0 all the time? >>> >> Yes, we can. We are not using this information at the moment. >> Right now, revision read is more or less for debug purposes. >> >> Would following patch work for you? Of course it will be difficult > Yes the patch works fine. Feel free to add a > > Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> > >
I have to take this back. I missed the part where some pmics are on slave id 2 or slave id 4, so this check isn't going to work. I've adjusted it to use sid % 2 instead and I'll resend these two patches, but I imagine to be more robust we're going to need to add a revid node to the DT under the SID that actually has it. Then we can search the child nodes for a revid compatible node and do the rev probing stuff.
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |