lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: dts: dra7: Add dt node for the sycon pcie
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> [151012 15:23]:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 03:42 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> [151012 15:09]:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 03:33 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> [151012 14:50]:
> >>>> Hi Tony,
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 02:51 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >>>>> * Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> [150915 06:37]:
> >>>>>> Add new device tree node for the control module register space where
> >>>>>> PCIe registers are present.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 5 +++++
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> >>>>>> index 5d65db9..0769b5d 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi
> >>>>>> @@ -154,6 +154,11 @@
> >>>>>> compatible = "syscon";
> >>>>>> reg = <0x1c04 0x0020>;
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + scm_conf_pcie: tisyscon@1c24 {
> >>>>>> + compatible = "syscon";
> >>>>>> + reg = <0x1c24 0x0024>;
> >>>>>> + };
> >>>>>> };
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> cm_core_aon: cm_core_aon@5000 {
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why don't you just extend the existing scm_conf1 area? This is not all pcie
> >>>>> specific for scm_conf_pcie, at least for PLLEN_CONTROL, RMII_CLK_SETTING
> >>>>> and MUXSEL_32K_CLKIN.
> >>>>
> >>>> scm_conf_pcie has only PCIe registers (it starts at 0x4A003C24).
> >>>> PLLEN_CONTROL and others are at 0x4A003C14 as per
> >>>> DRA75x_DRA74x_SR1.1_NDA_TRM_vW.
> >>>
> >>> Oh sorry I guess I was looking at a wrong address then.
> >>>
> >>>> Since PCIe itself has a bunch of registers for itself, thought of
> >>>> creating a separate dt node. But I can extend scm_conf1 area.
> >>>
> >>> Why not just ioremap them then? Do these need to be shared with
> >>> some other driver?
> >>
> >> yeah, some are used by PCIe controller driver and some are used by PCIe
> >> PHY driver.
> >
> > OK makes sense to me then.
>
> Cool.
>
> Btw the driver modifications has not yet been merged, so don't merge
> these yet. I'll repost these once the driver is merged.

OK thanks.

Tony


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-13 00:41    [W:0.037 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site