Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Oct 2015 19:42:41 +0200 | From | Frederic Weisbecker <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" |
| |
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:55:24PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 10/12/2015 12:53 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > Is it worth starting to think about grouping things under the > "task isolation" model somehow? "task_isolation_cpus=1-31" > or some such for this, and then that just sets up the nohz_full > and isolcpus options under the hood?
Yeah if I could do it again, I would have rather created something like cpu_isolation= (which name would conflict with isolcpus though) instead of nohz_full=, because nohz_full= is really just a subset of what people want.
But yeah if you guys want to create a new parameter that gathers nohz and isolcpus I think we can.
task_isolation is really just about tasks so it should be another name.
| |