lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 1/3] initialize each mbigen device node as a interrupt controller.
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:01:32 +0800
> "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com> wrote:
> > But there is a problem If i make the structure like you said.
> >
> > For example, my hardware structure likes below:
> >
> > uart ------> mbigen --> ITS-pMSI --> ITS --> GIC
> > virq1
> >
> > virq1 means the virq number allocted by irq_of_parse_and_map() function
> > when system parse the uart dts node in initializing stage.
> >
> > To create a ITS device, I need to call msi_domain_alloc_irqs() function
> > in my mbigen alloc function.
> >
> > In this function, a new virq number(named as virq2 ) which different from
> > virq1 is allocated.
> > So, this is a big problem.
>
> I think I see what your problem is:
> - The wired interrupt (uart -> mbigen) is allocated through DT (and
> must be available early, because of of_platform_populate),
> - The MSI (mgigen -> ITS) is dynamic (and allocated much later,
> because the device model kicks in after irqchip init, and we cannot
> allocate MSIs without a device).

Why do we need that wired interrupt at all?

We can make mbigen the 'msi-parent' of the device and let the
msi_domain_ops::msi_prepare() callback figure out the actual wiring
through device->fwnode.

Thanks,

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-11 12:21    [W:0.059 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site