Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | [PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: Use cpumask_copy instead of cpumask_or to copy a mask | Date | Sun, 11 Oct 2015 22:51:10 +0530 |
| |
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 25c4c15103a0..b32521432db4 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) if (new_policy) { /* related_cpus should at least include policy->cpus. */ - cpumask_or(policy->related_cpus, policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus); + cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus); /* Remember CPUs present at the policy creation time. */ cpumask_and(policy->real_cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_present_mask); } -- 2.4.0
| |