lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled
From
Date
On 10/01/2015 12:22 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> @@ -115,6 +118,9 @@ static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void)
>> */
>> static inline bool read_mems_allowed_retry(unsigned int seq)
>> {
>> + if (!cpusets_enabled())
>> + return false;
>> +
>> return read_seqcount_retry(&current->mems_allowed_seq, seq);
>> }
>>
>
> I thought this was going to test nr_cpusets() <= 1?

That was another patch in prior iteration of the series, but turns out
it was unnecessary, because cpusets_enabled() is already only true when
nr_cpusets() > 1 - see https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/25/300


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-01 09:41    [W:0.069 / U:1.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site