Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | "kyhw" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH] Add VID/PID for HID-type Multi-Touch Module of AFO CO., LTD. | Date | Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:21:57 +0900 |
| |
Thanks.
you are right. That's not necessary. We already processed.
The final purpose of my approach is that the correct working of the AFO multi-Touch module in All distribution of Linux. Therefore, the inclusion of the VID,PID(AFO Touch Module) to the hid-multitouch module is basically needed also for old version of the Linux distribution.
Ki.
-----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:jkosina@suse.cz] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:44 PM To: YongHwan Ki Cc: rydberg@euromail.se; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add VID/PID for HID-type Multi-Touch Module of AFO CO., LTD.
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, YongHwan Ki wrote:
> Sorry, I woud like to add the AFO defines in the Linux Kernel. > No afo defines exists in the current kernel tree. > I correctly changed the log for adding the afo defines. > > Kernel Version : linux-3.14.rc7 > Signed-off-by: Yonghwan Ki <kyhw@afoi.co.kr> > > diff -uprN -X Documentation/dontdiff ./drivers/hid/hid-core.c ../linux-3.14-rc7m/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > --- ./drivers/hid/hid-core.c 2014-03-17 10:51:24.000000000 +0900 > +++ ../linux-3.14-rc7m/drivers/hid/hid-core.c 2014-03-21 17:41:51.846939444 +0900 > @@ -1881,6 +1881,8 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_ha > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0005) }, > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0030) }, > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZYDACRON, > USB_DEVICE_ID_ZYDACRON_REMOTE_CONTROL) }, > + { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_AFO, USB_DEVICE_ID_AFO_TCM) }, > + { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_AFO, USB_DEVICE_ID_AFO_THM) },
Is this really necessary? Why doesn't HID_DG_CONTACTID matching work for the to automatically trigger HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH-based binding?
-- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
| |