lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] GMAC: fix simple_return.cocci warnings
Hi! David

What should I do now?

On 2015/1/5 11:20, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:46:45 -0800
>
>> On Sat, 2015-01-03 at 08:25 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c:425:1-4: WARNING: end returns can be simpified
>>>
>>> Simplify a trivial if-return sequence. Possibly combine with a
>>> preceding function call.
>>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/simple_return.cocci
>>>
>>> CC: Roger Chen <roger.chen@rock-chips.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> dwmac-rk.c | 6 +-----
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c
>>> @@ -422,11 +422,7 @@ static int rk_gmac_init(struct platform_
>>> if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> - ret = gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, true);
>>> - if (ret)
>>> - return ret;
>>> -
>>> - return 0;
>>> + return gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, true);
>> I think this change is not particularly better.
>>
>> When the pattern is multiply repeated like:
> ...
>> I think it's better to not change the last
>> test in the sequence just to minimize overall
>> line count.
> I think it's a wash and that both ways are about the same to me.
>
> I won't apply this, sorry.
>
>
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-01-06 08:41    [W:0.053 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site