Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 06 Jan 2015 15:13:39 +0800 | From | Roger <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] GMAC: fix simple_return.cocci warnings |
| |
Hi! David
What should I do now?
On 2015/1/5 11:20, David Miller wrote: > From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> > Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 16:46:45 -0800 > >> On Sat, 2015-01-03 at 08:25 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: >>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c:425:1-4: WARNING: end returns can be simpified >>> >>> Simplify a trivial if-return sequence. Possibly combine with a >>> preceding function call. >>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/simple_return.cocci >>> >>> CC: Roger Chen <roger.chen@rock-chips.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> >>> --- >>> >>> dwmac-rk.c | 6 +----- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-rk.c >>> @@ -422,11 +422,7 @@ static int rk_gmac_init(struct platform_ >>> if (ret) >>> return ret; >>> >>> - ret = gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, true); >>> - if (ret) >>> - return ret; >>> - >>> - return 0; >>> + return gmac_clk_enable(bsp_priv, true); >> I think this change is not particularly better. >> >> When the pattern is multiply repeated like: > ... >> I think it's better to not change the last >> test in the sequence just to minimize overall >> line count. > I think it's a wash and that both ways are about the same to me. > > I won't apply this, sorry. > > >
| |