Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Jan 2015 20:27:06 +0800 | From | Vince Hsu <> | Subject | Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH nouveau 09/11] drm: export some variable and functions to resue the PM functions |
| |
On 01/06/2015 07:49 PM, Thierry Reding wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 08:50:18PM +0100, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:18:34AM +0800, Vince Hsu wrote: >>>> Hi Emil, >>>> >>>> On 12/30/2014 10:34 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: >>>>> On 23/12/14 10:40, Vince Hsu wrote: >>>>>> This patch adds some checks in the suspend/resume functions to distinguish >>>>>> the dGPU and mobile GPU and exports some variables/functions so that the >>>>>> nouveau platform device can reuse them. >>>>>> >>>>> Hi Vince, >>>>> >>>>> Afaiu one needs to export a symbol as it's used by another module or >>>>> subsystem. With the follow up two patches you are not doing either one, >>>>> so I'd assume that you can just omit the EXPORT_* changes. >>>> The nouveau platform device driver is built as another module - >>>> nouveau_platform.ko. :) >>> I'd like to hear the opinion of the nouveau people and Alex, but I'd >>> very much prefer if nouveau_platform.o was simply linked into the >>> nouveau.ko module. I don't see any good reason to keep it separate. >> Yep, I agree. The decision to host platform support in a separate >> module looks misleaded if it results in additional exports that we >> would otherwise avoid. IIUC I did this to be able to use the module >> convenience macros to register the platform driver. >> >>> Something like the attached patch (untested) ought to do it. >> This patch alone won't be enough for the reason I mentioned above. >> However, if Vince doesn't mind handling the platform driver >> registration manually in nouveau_drm_init/nouveau_drm_exit, I agree >> this would be the way to go. > If we do the conversion to generic power domains, the only Tegra- > specific API remaining will be the access to the fuse registers for the > speedo value. At that point we wouldn't need the ARCH_TEGRA dependency > any longer and could always build the platform driver along with the PCI > driver. Do we really want the platform driver always built with the PCI driver even there is no dependency between them. Actually I have some patches to build the platform driver with !CONFIG_PCI and would like to post them maybe later.
Thanks, Vince
> > I guess we could do that even now if we simply #ifdef the various Tegra- > specific parts. That in turn would have the advantage that we don't need > to #ifdef the driver registration code. And it would help separate > things in case anybody wanted to use one of the SoC GPUs in a non-Tegra > SoC.
| |