[lkml]   [2015]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3]: x86, fpu: unlazy_fpu fixes/cleanups
On 01/29/2015 01:33 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 01/29, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 01/29/2015 01:07 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>> On 01/23, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>>>> Not only is this broken with my new code, but it looks like it may
>>>>> be broken with the current code, too...
>>> Lets (try to) fix unlazy_fpu/save_init_fpu at least.
>>> Dave, fpu_save_init() in do_bounds() and task_get_bounds_dir() looks
>>> wrong too, shouldn't it use unlazy_fpu() ? See the changelog in 3/3.
>> IIRC, the 'cpu_has_xsaveopt' on the CPUs that support will MPX will
>> enable eagerfpu.
> unless eagerfpu=off? but this doesn't matter.

Yeah, that's true. That would also explain why I haven't run in to this
at all in testing.

Ugh, fpu_save_init() says it isn't preempt safe anyway, so we shouldn't
be using it.

I'll send a fix.

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-01-29 23:01    [W:0.092 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site