Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:52:56 +0100 | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/9] clocksource: Driver for Conexant Digicolor SoC timer |
| |
On 01/29/2015 02:37 PM, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 14:08 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> >> >> Add clocksource driver to the Conexant CX92755 SoC, part of the Digicolor SoCs >> series. Hardware provides 8 timers, A to H. Timer A is dedicated to a future >> watchdog driver so we don't use it here. Use timer B for sched_clock, and timer >> C for clock_event. >> >> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> >> --- >> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 3 + >> drivers/clocksource/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/clocksource/timer-digicolor.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 203 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/clocksource/timer-digicolor.c >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig >> index a89120b..72a3827 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig >> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ config CLKBLD_I8253 >> config CLKSRC_MMIO >> bool >> >> +config DIGICOLOR_TIMER >> + bool >> + > > And the select for this symbol (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/360) > will be provided in a separate patch? Because this patch, by itself, > won't allow DIGICOLOR_TIMER to be set, will it?
You are right, that should be done in a separate patch. I believe Baruch should have done that.
-- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
| |