lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/9] clocksource: Driver for Conexant Digicolor SoC timer
On 01/29/2015 02:37 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-01-29 at 14:08 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
>>
>> Add clocksource driver to the Conexant CX92755 SoC, part of the Digicolor SoCs
>> series. Hardware provides 8 timers, A to H. Timer A is dedicated to a future
>> watchdog driver so we don't use it here. Use timer B for sched_clock, and timer
>> C for clock_event.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 3 +
>> drivers/clocksource/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/clocksource/timer-digicolor.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 203 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/clocksource/timer-digicolor.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>> index a89120b..72a3827 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>> @@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ config CLKBLD_I8253
>> config CLKSRC_MMIO
>> bool
>>
>> +config DIGICOLOR_TIMER
>> + bool
>> +
>
> And the select for this symbol (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/26/360)
> will be provided in a separate patch? Because this patch, by itself,
> won't allow DIGICOLOR_TIMER to be set, will it?

You are right, that should be done in a separate patch. I believe Baruch
should have done that.

--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-01-29 15:01    [W:0.046 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site