[lkml]   [2015]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm v2 1/3] slub: never fail to shrink cache
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Andrew Morton wrote:

> The logic behind choosing "32" sounds rather rubbery. What goes wrong
> if we use, say, "4"?

Like more fragmentation of slab pages.

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-01-29 03:41    [W:0.147 / U:1.128 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site