Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:12:23 -0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: xgene: fix: Out of order descriptor bytes read | From | Iyappan Subramanian <> |
| |
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 12:03 -0800, Iyappan Subramanian wrote: >> This patch fixes the following kernel crash, >> >> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 0 at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:3079 tcp_clean_rtx_queue+0x658/0x80c() >> Call trace: > >> >> Software writes poison data into the descriptor bytes[15:8] and upon >> receiving the interrupt, if those bytes are overwritten by the hardware with >> the valid data, software also reads bytes[7:0] and executes receive/tx >> completion logic. >> >> If the CPU executes the above two reads in out of order fashion, then the >> bytes[7:0] will have older data and causing the kernel panic. We have to >> force the order of the reads and thus this patch introduces read memory >> barrier between these reads. >> >> Signed-off-by: Iyappan Subramanian <isubramanian@apm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Keyur Chudgar <kchudgar@apm.com> >> Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_main.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_main.c >> index 83a5028..3622cdb 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/apm/xgene/xgene_enet_main.c >> @@ -369,6 +369,8 @@ static int xgene_enet_process_ring(struct xgene_enet_desc_ring *ring, >> if (unlikely(xgene_enet_is_desc_slot_empty(raw_desc))) >> break; >> >> + /* read fpqnum field after dataaddr field */ >> + smp_rmb(); >> if (is_rx_desc(raw_desc)) >> ret = xgene_enet_rx_frame(ring, raw_desc); >> else > > Reading your changelog, it looks like you need a plain rmb() here.
rmb() translates into dsb, which in arm64 serializes everything including instructions and thus expensive compared to dmb.
Do you see any issue with smp_rmb() (which translates into dmb) ?
> > >
| |