Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:32:37 +0100 | From | Paolo Bonzini <> | Subject | Re: KVM: HAVE_KVM_ARCH_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT? |
| |
On 22/01/2015 15:49, Paul Bolle wrote: >> > Ah, there are two Kconfig symbols added by mistake. >> > >> > +config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT >> > + bool >> > + >> > +config KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT >> > + bool > This one is actually used (so my 800 line perl monster didn't bark): > $ git grep -n KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT next-20150122 > next-20150122:arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig:27: select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT > next-20150122:arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig:30: select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT > next-20150122:arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig:42: select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT > next-20150122:virt/kvm/Kconfig:47:config KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT > next-20150122:virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:998:#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT >
Yes, the mistake is adding two symbols instead of one. :)
Paolo
| |