lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: KVM: HAVE_KVM_ARCH_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT?


On 22/01/2015 15:49, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> > Ah, there are two Kconfig symbols added by mistake.
>> >
>> > +config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_DIRTY_LOG_PROTECT
>> > + bool
>> > +
>> > +config KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>> > + bool
> This one is actually used (so my 800 line perl monster didn't bark):
> $ git grep -n KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT next-20150122
> next-20150122:arch/arm/kvm/Kconfig:27: select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
> next-20150122:arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig:30: select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
> next-20150122:arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig:42: select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
> next-20150122:virt/kvm/Kconfig:47:config KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
> next-20150122:virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:998:#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>

Yes, the mistake is adding two symbols instead of one. :)

Paolo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-01-22 16:41    [W:0.050 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site