lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: About 2 ACPICA table patches
From
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>
> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 05:02:31 PM Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Zheng, Lv <lv.zheng@intel.com> wrote:
> > > Hi, Octavian
> > >
> >
> > Hi Lv,
> >
> > > I noticed there are 2 patches you've sent to the community.
> > > But unfortunately I didn't find them in my mailbox.
> > > Let me comment you here.
> > >
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5501621/
> > > This patch seem to be correct.
> > > But Rafael should merge it directly via Linux because acpi_unload_table_id() is not in the ACPICA upstream.
> >
> > OK, thanks for letting me know. Rafel, does the patch look ok to you?
>
> I'm Rafael, but that's OK.
>

Oops, sorry about that, typo :(

What about patch 3 of the original set [1], does it look better now?

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/12/16/290


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-01-20 16:41    [W:0.046 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site