Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:13:25 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 01/14] sh: Eliminate unused irq_reg_{readl,writel} accessors | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
Hi Jason,
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 05:38:44PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:13:49AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >>> >>> > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > Defining these macros way down in arch/sh/.../irq.c doesn't cause >>> > > kernel/irq/generic-chip.c to use them. As far as I can tell this code >>> > > has no effect. >>> > > >>> > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@gmail.com> >>> > >>> > Compared preprocessor and asm output before and after, no difference >>> > except for line numbers, so >>> > >>> > Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> >>> >>> I noticed the remainder of of this series is now in Jason Cooper's irqchip >>> tree. Is anybody still taking care of SH? If not I can funnel it >>> through the MIPS tree. >> >> Are the SH maintainers active? I admit I know very little about the >> arch. I'm more than happy to pick it up and keep it with the rest of >> the series, I just didn't want to step on toes... > > SH is orphaned, so it would be great if you could pick it up. > Thanks!
I think you forgot to pick it up, as se7343 and se7722 are still broken:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12346740/ http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12346745/
Will you still do so, or shall I forward the patch to Andrew Morton?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |