Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 9 Sep 2014 15:24:05 +0800 | From | Wanpeng Li <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND v4] sched: fix llc shared map unreleased during cpu hotplug |
| |
Hi Mike, On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 09:06:32AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: >Hm, this patchlet seems to be having trouble taking wing. > >(tosses it up in the air.. flap yer little wings patchlet) > >I thought you had changed the title to.. > >x86,cpu-hotplug: clear llc_shared_mask at CPU hotplug > >..due to Peter saying sched is only a consumer, but v4 somehow reverted >back to being a sched patch. >
I send out the RESEND v4 by a mistake, please refer the below link for the patch. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/29/159
Regards, Wanpeng Li
>On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 13:49 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> [ 220.262245] Call Trace: >> [ 220.262252] [<ffffffff810e8396>] load_balance+0x156/0x980 >> [ 220.262259] [<ffffffff816eeffe>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2e/0xa0 >> [ 220.262266] [<ffffffff810e9aa3>] idle_balance+0xe3/0x150 >> [ 220.262270] [<ffffffff816ec4e7>] __schedule+0x797/0x8d0 >> [ 220.262277] [<ffffffff816ec934>] schedule+0x24/0x70 >> [ 220.262283] [<ffffffff816e9cd9>] schedule_timeout+0x119/0x1f0 >> [ 220.262294] [<ffffffff810bb6e0>] ? lock_timer_base+0x70/0x70 >> [ 220.262301] [<ffffffff816e9dc9>] schedule_timeout_uninterruptible+0x19/0x20 >> [ 220.262308] [<ffffffff810bd3e8>] msleep+0x18/0x20 >> [ 220.262317] [<ffffffff813aa11a>] lock_device_hotplug_sysfs+0x2a/0x50 >> [ 220.262323] [<ffffffff813aa16e>] online_store+0x2e/0x80 >> [ 220.262358] [<ffffffff813a873b>] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x20 >> >> Last level cache shared map is built during cpu up and build sched domain >> routine takes advantage of it to setup sched domain cpu topology, however, >> llc shared map is unreleased during cpu disable which lead to invalid sched >> domain cpu topology. This patch fix it by release llc shared map correctly >> during cpu disable. >> >> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> >> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> >> Tested-by: Linn Crosetto <linn@hp.com> >> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com> >> --- >> v3 -> v4: >> * simplify backtrace >> v2 -> v3: >> * simplify backtrace >> v1 -> v2: >> * fix subject line >> >> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c >> index 5492798..0134ec7 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c >> @@ -1292,6 +1292,9 @@ static void remove_siblinginfo(int cpu) >> >> for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)) >> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(sibling)); >> + for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)) >> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_llc_shared_mask(sibling)); >> + cpumask_clear(cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu)); >> cpumask_clear(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu)); >> cpumask_clear(cpu_core_mask(cpu)); >> c->phys_proc_id = 0; >
| |