lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Sep]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86 : Ensure X86_FLAGS_NT is cleared on syscall entry
    From
    On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert.lkml@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    > I don't get it. Why isn't this patch acceptable, at least on x86-64
    > where NT is never valid?

    Why do you think it's not acceptable? Why do you raise a stink *one*
    day after the patch - that seems to not be very important - is sent
    out?

    Why would SIGSEGV even be that bad? The program does crap things, why
    accept it silently?

    I don't think the patch is necessarily wrong, but I don't see why it
    would be critical, and I *definitely* don't see why the f*ck you are
    making a big deal of it.

    Go away, stop bothering people.

    Linus


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2014-09-27 02:01    [W:3.680 / U:2.204 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site