Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:58:03 -0700 | From | josh@joshtrip ... | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] Silence even more W=2 warnings |
| |
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 07:37:19PM +0000, Rustad, Mark D wrote: > Most of the others come from null-entry table initializations, i.e. { > 0 }, which give missing field initializer warnings.
I'd suggest that such initializers should just be {}, not { 0 }, and we should teach compilers to specifically *not* complain about empty initializers even when otherwise complaining about missing fields. Initializing a structure to 0 is completely sensible.
- Josh Triplett
| |