Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:30:38 +0530 | From | Vinod Koul <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/27] PM: Add helper pm_runtime_last_busy_and_autosuspend() |
| |
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 07:54:10PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2014-09-24 21:44:51, Vinod Koul wrote: > > From: Subhransu S. Prusty <subhransu.s.prusty@intel.com> > > > > pm_runtime_mark_last_busy and pm_runtime_put_autosuspend are used together > > in quite a lot of places. Add a helper for these. > > Also updated Documentation for this > > With function name as long as the implementation... I'm not sure if > this is good helper :-). am all ears if that is a general consensus to cut down on length and suggestions welcome :)
-- ~Vinod
> Pavel > > > +static inline int pm_runtime_last_busy_and_autosuspend(struct device *dev) > > +{ > > + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev); > > + return pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev); > > +} > > -- > (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek > (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
| |