lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: viperboard: allocate I/O buffer separately
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 01:00:02PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:12:06AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> > >
> > > > Currently the I/O buffer is allocated part of the device status
> > > > structure, potentially sharing the same cache line with other members
> > > > in this structure.
> > > >
> > > > Allocate the buffer separately, to avoid the I/O operations corrupting
> > > > the device status structure due to cache line sharing.
> > > >
> > > > Compiled tested only as I don't have access to hardware.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/mfd/viperboard.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > > include/linux/mfd/viperboard.h | 2 +-
> > > > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> > > > index e00f534..5f62f4e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/viperboard.c
> > > > @@ -64,6 +64,12 @@ static int vprbrd_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
> > > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + vb->buf = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vprbrd_i2c_write_msg), GFP_KERNEL);
> > >
> > > Can you obtain the 'struct device' first then use managed resources
> > > (devm_*)?
> >
> > I think any devres conversion should be done in a follow-up patch and
> > not be included in the fix (e.g. in order to facilitate backporting). We
> > also don't want to mix allocation schemes.
>
> I agree, but equally I'm not keen on accepting this patch as I believe
> it could be done better.
>
> Please submit two patches, one converting to shared resources and this
> being the subsequent one, fixed up to do the right thing.

A buffer-corruption fix is a candidate for stable, whereas a devres
conversion (clean up) is not. Hence the former should not depend on the
latter.

Johan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-09-24 15:01    [W:1.519 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site