lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] usb: core: downgrade log severity to info when descriptor unavailable
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:12:40PM +0000, Scot Doyle wrote:
> According to commit 0cce2eda19923e5e5ccc8b042dec5af87b3ffad0
> USB: fix LANGID=0 regression
>
> usb devices are not required to report string descriptors. Since they are
> optional, log an info message instead of an error message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Scot Doyle <lkml14@scotdoyle.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/core/message.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/message.c b/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> index 0c8a7fc..da2f1f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> @@ -780,8 +780,12 @@ static int usb_get_langid(struct usb_device *dev, unsigned char *tbuf)
> * deal with strings at all. Set string_langid to -1 in order to
> * prevent any string to be retrieved from the device */
> if (err < 0) {
> - dev_err(&dev->dev, "string descriptor 0 read error: %d\n",
> - err);
> + if (err == -EPIPE)
> + dev_info(&dev->dev,
> + "string descriptor 0 read error: -EPIPE\n");
> + else
> + dev_err(&dev->dev,
> + "string descriptor 0 read error: %d\n", err);

What real difference does this patch make? What would a user do with
-EPIPE?

And USB devices _are_ required to provide a string descriptor if they
provide a string id, so your changelog body doesn't make much sense. I
suggest rewriting it to say they aren't required to provide a string
descriptor for string "0".

But even then, I don't understand the goal of this patch.

thanks,

greg k-h

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-09-24 10:21    [W:0.098 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site