Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Sep 2014 02:33:25 +0900 | From | Masami Hiramatsu <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] ftracetest: Initial commit for ftracetest |
| |
(2014/09/19 23:42), Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:05:23 -0600 > Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > > >> I am not concerned about the spacing. >> >> Thanks for doing running the make kselftest target and sharing >> the results. selftests don't get built or run in integ test >> rings. I am working on addressing this at the moment. >> >> Steven! >> >> Could you please take this through your tree. You have my >> >> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> >> >> for the selftests Makefile > > OK, thanks! > > I'll start trying to get my own personal tests working here.
Great :)
> > It may take some work as my tests may run for 10s of minutes, as they > are more stress tests than a pass/fail thing. But I should have > something other people can use. I'll continue using both my own > personal tests as well as trying the new stuff that gets put here.
I think you can also put your stress tests in the ftrace/ directory (or just make a sub-directory for them). Even ftracetest doesn't run them, we can update Makefile so that kselftest can run them. For example, I will add a testcase for my IPMODFIY as a separated test(ftrace/ipmodify), since it involves some special kernel modules and doesn't use ftrace debugfs interface but tests ftrace(function trace).
Thank you,
-- Masami HIRAMATSU Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
| |