lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf
Date
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

71 is a Broadwell, not a Haswell. The model number was added
by mistake earlier.

Remove it for now, until it can be re-added later with
real Broadwell support.

In practice it does not cause a lot of issues because the Broadwell
PMU is very similar to Haswell, but some details were wrong,
and it's better to handle it correctly.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 89bc750..f962e26 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2544,7 +2544,6 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
case 63:
case 69:
case 70:
- case 71:
x86_pmu.late_ack = true;
memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, snb_hw_cache_event_ids, sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, snb_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
--
1.9.3


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-09-02 21:21    [W:1.502 / U:0.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site