Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:37:08 -0700 | Subject | Re: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699) | From | Cong Wang <> |
| |
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 11:15 -0700, Cong Wang wrote: > >> That is what we do when backporting patches, I can do that if David asks >> me to backport it, but you know for netdev that is David's work. >> >> (I am not saying I don't want to help him, I just want to point out the fact. >> I am very pleased to help David for stable backports as long as he asks) > > Problem is : your patch submission do not identify bug origin. > > You claim you want to help, but you do not provide the basic thing that > _really_ helps. > > The proper way to identify bug origin is to add in the headers one > line : > > Fixes: 12-digit-SHA1 ("patch title") >
Since when "Fixes:" tag becomes mandatory for a stable patch? At least netdev-FAQ is not updated. ;-) I 100% agree "Fixes:" is helpful when backporting patches, but it is not mandatory currently.
For this patch, I was too lazy to dig the history, it looks like this is caused by the following commit:
commit c15b1ccadb323ea50023e8f1cca2954129a62b51 Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Date: Thu Mar 27 18:28:07 2014 +0100
ipv6: move DAD and addrconf_verify processing to workqueue
Thanks.
| |