lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Sep]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: RTNL: assertion failed at net/ipv6/addrconf.c (1699)
From
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 11:15 -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
>
>> That is what we do when backporting patches, I can do that if David asks
>> me to backport it, but you know for netdev that is David's work.
>>
>> (I am not saying I don't want to help him, I just want to point out the fact.
>> I am very pleased to help David for stable backports as long as he asks)
>
> Problem is : your patch submission do not identify bug origin.
>
> You claim you want to help, but you do not provide the basic thing that
> _really_ helps.
>
> The proper way to identify bug origin is to add in the headers one
> line :
>
> Fixes: 12-digit-SHA1 ("patch title")
>

Since when "Fixes:" tag becomes mandatory for a stable patch?
At least netdev-FAQ is not updated. ;-) I 100% agree "Fixes:"
is helpful when backporting patches, but it is not mandatory currently.

For this patch, I was too lazy to dig the history, it looks like this is
caused by the following commit:

commit c15b1ccadb323ea50023e8f1cca2954129a62b51
Author: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Date: Thu Mar 27 18:28:07 2014 +0100

ipv6: move DAD and addrconf_verify processing to workqueue

Thanks.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-09-02 21:21    [W:0.058 / U:0.684 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site