Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:55:54 +0530 | From | Sudip Mukherjee <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] sound: pci: ctxfi: pr_* replaced with dev_* |
| |
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:29:48PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Mon, 15 Sep 2014 19:39:41 +0530, > Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > > pr_* macros replaced with dev_* as they are more preffered over pr_*. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org> > > --- > > > > in v1 Takashi mentioned that now we have card->dev > > so v2 is using card->dev as much as possible. > > > > sound/pci/ctxfi/ctatc.c | 24 ++++++++++++++---------- > > sound/pci/ctxfi/cthw20k1.c | 15 +++++++++------ > > sound/pci/ctxfi/cthw20k2.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- > > sound/pci/ctxfi/ctmixer.c | 6 ++++-- > > sound/pci/ctxfi/ctpcm.c | 9 ++++++--- > > sound/pci/ctxfi/ctresource.c | 20 +++++++++++++------- > > sound/pci/ctxfi/xfi.c | 15 +++++++++------ > > 7 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctatc.c b/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctatc.c > > index d92a08c..a786bc1 100644 > > --- a/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctatc.c > > +++ b/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctatc.c > > @@ -1282,8 +1282,8 @@ static int atc_identify_card(struct ct_atc *atc, unsigned int ssid) > > p = snd_pci_quirk_lookup_id(vendor_id, device_id, list); > > if (p) { > > if (p->value < 0) { > > - pr_err("ctxfi: Device %04x:%04x is black-listed\n", > > - vendor_id, device_id); > > + dev_err(atc->card->dev, "ctxfi: Device %04x:%04x is black-listed\n", > > + vendor_id, device_id); > > You need no prefix for dev_xxx(). > i was also thinking that . :) > > diff --git a/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctresource.c b/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctresource.c > > index e49d2be..80beecb 100644 > > --- a/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctresource.c > > +++ b/sound/pci/ctxfi/ctresource.c > (snip) > > @@ -282,8 +287,9 @@ int rsc_mgr_uninit(struct rsc_mgr *mgr) > > case SUM: > > break; > > default: > > - pr_err("ctxfi: Invalid resource type value %d!\n", > > - mgr->type); > > + dev_err(&(((struct hw *)mgr->hw)->pci->dev), > > + "ctxfi: Invalid resource type value %d!\n", > > + mgr->type); > > Did you really conclude that this is the best way? > Also, is it good to mix up the usages of both card->dev and &pci->dev? > Think again. >
i have a doubt regarding this :- in the snd_card_new() card->dev is being assigned with &pci->dev , then are not they the same ?
i was trying to get some way of finding out the reference of card->dev from the resource manager , but ... :( i will try again and if i cant find any way i will ask for some hint from you.
i am still a newbie , and started this pr_* to dev_* on your inspiration , and i hope you will not be irritated by my patches . :)
thanks sudip
> > thanks, > > Takashi
| |