lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v10 00/10] Support for creating generic PCI host bridges from DT
On 9/8/2014 8:54 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> This is my version 10 of the attempt at adding support for generic PCI host
> bridge controllers that make use of device tree information to
> configure themselves. This version reverses v9's attempt to create one function
> to drive the whole process of extracting the host bridge ranges, setup the
> host bridge driver and then scan the root bus behind the host bridge. While it
> would've been quite user friendly, I agree that it would've caused a lot of pain
> in the future.
>
> I would like to get ACKs for the remaining patches as I would like to integrate
> this into -next in the following week.
>
> This version marks an implementation break with the previous versions as
> of_create_pci_host_bridge() is now gone. It gets replaced by
> of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() that only parses the DT and extracts the
> relevant ranges and converts them to resources. The updated host bridge drivers
> will have to follow the guidelines in this example code:
>
> static int foohb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct foohb_drv *drv;
> resource_size_t io_base = 0; /* phys address for start of IO */
> struct pci_bus *bus;
> int err = 0;
> LIST_HEAD(res);
>
> .....
> err = of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(dn, 0, 255, &res, &io_base);
> if (err)
> goto err_handling;
> err = foohb_setup(drv, ...., &res, &io_base);
> if (err)
> goto err_handling;

My understanding is that the "foohb_setup" above is supposed to be equivalent
to the "int (*setup)(struct pci_host_bridge *, resource_size_t)" in V9 that was
passed in as an argument of "of_create_pci_hot_bridge()".

The problem I have is I need an intermediate step between "pci_create_root_bus()"
and "pci_scan_child_bus()" in order to update the information such as the "pci_bus->msi"
before this is propagate down to the child bus during the "pci_scan_child_bus"
which is also called in the pci_scan_root_bus() function.

Does this mean that I should not be calling the pci_scan_root_bus(), and tries to
re-implement the same logic in my driver?

Thanks,

Suravee

> .....
> pci_add_flags(....);
> bus = pci_scan_root_bus(&pdev->dev, 0, &foohb_ops, drv, &res);
> if (!bus)
> goto err_handling;
> ....
> return 0;
>
> err_handling:
> ......
> return err;
> }
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-09-12 11:01    [W:0.293 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site