Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 12 Sep 2014 14:50:19 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] fs: proc: use seq_open_private() |
| |
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:09:36 +0100 Rob Jones <rob.jones@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> fs: proc: use __seq_open_private() > fs: proc: use __seq_open_private()
See the problem? We have two different patches, both named the same.
I renamed them to
fs/proc/task_nommu.c: use __seq_open_private() fs/proc/task_mmu.c: use __seq_open_private()
I really don't understand this practice of replacing "/" with ": " in patch titles. Why not just use the "/"?
| |