lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Sep]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC v2 8/9] KVM: KVM-VFIO: generic KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE command and IRQ forwarding control
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 11:05:49PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 05:10 +0200, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 02:52:47PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:

[...]

> > >
> > > +#ifdef __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_KVM_VFIO_FORWARD
> > > +int kvm_arch_set_fwd_state(struct kvm_fwd_irq *pfwd,
> >
> > what's the 'p' in pfwd?
>
> p is for pointer?
>

shouldn't the type declation spell out quite clearly to me that I'm
dealing with a pointer?

[...]

> >
> > need some spaceing here, also, I would turn this around, first check if
> > the strcmp fails, and then error out, then do you next check etc., to
> > avoid so many nested statements.
> >
> > > + /* is a ref to this device already owned by the KVM-VFIO device? */
> >
> > this comment is not particularly helpful in its current form, it would
> > be helpful if you specified that we're checking whether that particular
> > device/irq combo is already registered.
> >
> > > + *kvm_vdev = kvm_vfio_find_device(kv, vdev);
> > > + if (*kvm_vdev) {
> > > + if (kvm_vfio_find_irq(*kvm_vdev, fwd_irq->index)) {
> > > + kvm_err("%s irq %d already forwarded\n",
> > > + __func__, *hwirq);
>
> Why didn't we do this first?
>
huh?

-Christoffer


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-09-11 19:41    [W:0.100 / U:0.220 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site