Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Sep 2014 09:51:29 +0300 | From | Dan Carpenter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm/sl[aou]b: make kfree() aware of error pointers |
| |
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 01:15:15AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Tue, 09 Sep 2014 16:21:14 -0700, Andrew Morton said: > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2014 23:25:28 +0200 (CEST) Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote: > > kfree() is quite a hot path to which this will add overhead. And we > > have (as far as we know) no code which will actually use this at > > present. > > We already do a check for ZERO_SIZE_PTR, and given that dereferencing *that* is > instant death for the kernel, and we see it very rarely, I'm going to guess > that IS_ERR(ptr) *has* to be true more often than ZERO_SIZE_PTR, and thus even > more advantageous to short-circuit.
ZERO_SIZE_PTR is sort of common.
ZERO_SIZE_PTR is an mm abstraction and kfree() and ksize() are basically the only places where we need to test for it. Also friends of kfree() like jbd2_journal_free_transaction().
regards, dan carpenter
| |