lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Sep]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] iio: adc: rockchip_saradc: add support for rk3066-tsadc variant
On 03/09/14 11:13, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 3. September 2014, 00:20:58 schrieb Hartmut Knaack:
>> Heiko Stübner schrieb:
>>> Older Rockchip SoCs, at least the rk3066, used a slightly modified saradc
>>> for temperature measurements. This so called tsadc does not contain any
>>> active parts like temperature interrupts and only supports polling the
>>> current temperature. The returned voltage can then be converted by a
>>> suitable thermal driver to and actual temperature and used for thermal
>>> handling.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>> ---
>>
>> Looks mostly good to me, just some minor style issues inline.
>>
>>> This is a different IP than the rk3288-tsadc Ceasar provided a driver for.
>>> As the commit messages states, the one used on the rk3066 is just a
>>> saradc,
>>> while the new tsadc in the rk3288 contains active components for thermal
>>> handling.
>>>
>>> A working example using the pending iio-thermal driver can found on
>>> https://github.com/mmind/linux-rockchip/commit/c07e02f069d9677d489f2541766
>>> 19fae36f2aad0>
>>> .../bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt | 2 +-
>>> drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c | 62
>>> +++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 14
>>> deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt index
>>> 5d3ec1d..a9a5fe1 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/rockchip-saradc.txt
>>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>>>
>>> Rockchip Successive Approximation Register (SAR) A/D Converter bindings
>>>
>>> Required properties:
>>> -- compatible: Should be "rockchip,saradc"
>>> +- compatible: Should be "rockchip,saradc" or "rockchip,rk3066-tsadc"
>>>
>>> - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
>>> mapped
>>>
>>> region.
>>>
>>> - interrupts: The interrupt number to the cpu. The interrupt specifier
>>> format>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c
>>> b/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c index e074a0b..7effada 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/rockchip_saradc.c
>>> @@ -18,13 +18,13 @@
>>>
>>> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>> #include <linux/io.h>
>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>>
>>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>>
>>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>>> #include <linux/completion.h>
>>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>> #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
>>>
>>> #define SARADC_DATA 0x00
>>>
>>> -#define SARADC_DATA_MASK 0x3ff
>>>
>>> #define SARADC_STAS 0x04
>>> #define SARADC_STAS_BUSY BIT(0)
>>>
>>> @@ -38,15 +38,22 @@
>>>
>>> #define SARADC_DLY_PU_SOC 0x0c
>>> #define SARADC_DLY_PU_SOC_MASK 0x3f
>>>
>>> -#define SARADC_BITS 10
>>>
>>> #define SARADC_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(100)
>>>
>>> +struct rockchip_saradc_data {
>>> + int num_bits;
>>> + const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
>>> + int num_channels;
>>> + unsigned long clk_rate;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>>
>>> struct rockchip_saradc {
>>>
>>> void __iomem *regs;
>>> struct clk *pclk;
>>> struct clk *clk;
>>> struct completion completion;
>>> struct regulator *vref;
>>>
>>> + const struct rockchip_saradc_data *data;
>>>
>>> u16 last_val;
>>>
>>> };
>>
>> The alignment of the whole block should be adjusted to fit with the new
>> element.
>
> Hmm, I'm not sure if this should be in this patch, as changing the indentation
> is more or less an unrelated change which makes recognizing the actual change
> of adding the data field harder to see.
>
> It could be a second patch on top to adapt the formating, but this also sounds
> a bit like overkill.
>
> In any case I guess I'll wait for Jonathan to decide how he likes this to be
> approached.
>
Personally I hate this sort of careful block alignment for structures precisely because
it generates churn. I just don't hate it enough to moan about it in reviews :)

Definitely doesn't want to be in this patch, but feel free to submit another
either tidying up or dropping it in favour of not bothering to align it.


>
>>> @@ -90,7 +97,7 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev
>>> *indio_dev,>
>>> }
>>>
>>> *val = ret / 1000;
>>>
>>> - *val2 = SARADC_BITS;
>>> + *val2 = info->data->num_bits;
>>>
>>> return IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LOG2;
>>>
>>> default:
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> @@ -103,7 +110,7 @@ static irqreturn_t rockchip_saradc_isr(int irq, void
>>> *dev_id)>
>>> /* Read value */
>>> info->last_val = readl_relaxed(info->regs + SARADC_DATA);
>>>
>>> - info->last_val &= SARADC_DATA_MASK;
>>> + info->last_val &= BIT(info->data->num_bits) - 1;
>>
>> I think using GENMASK would reflect the intention better, that you want to
>> mask out your data.
>
> I didn't know GENMASK before, so thanks for the pointer .. this looks quite
> cool :-)
>
>
>>> /* Clear irq & power down adc */
>>> writel_relaxed(0, info->regs + SARADC_CTRL);
>>>
>>> @@ -133,12 +140,44 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec
>>> rockchip_saradc_iio_channels[] = {>
>>> ADC_CHANNEL(2, "adc2"),
>>>
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static const struct rockchip_saradc_data saradc_data = {
>>> + .num_bits = 10,
>>> + .channels = rockchip_saradc_iio_channels,
>>> + .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_saradc_iio_channels),
>>> + .clk_rate = 1000000,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct iio_chan_spec rockchip_rk3066_tsadc_iio_channels[] =
>>> {
>>> + ADC_CHANNEL(0, "adc0"),
>>> + ADC_CHANNEL(1, "adc1"),
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct rockchip_saradc_data rk3066_tsadc_data = {
>>> + .num_bits = 12,
>>> + .channels = rockchip_rk3066_tsadc_iio_channels,
>>> + .num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_rk3066_tsadc_iio_channels),
>>> + .clk_rate = 50000,
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id rockchip_saradc_match[] = {
>>> + {
>>> + .compatible = "rockchip,saradc",
>>> + .data = &saradc_data,
>>> + }, {
>>> + .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-tsadc",
>>> + .data = &rk3066_tsadc_data,
>>> + },
>>> + {},
>>> +};
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_saradc_match);
>>> +
>>>
>>> static int rockchip_saradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>>
>>> struct rockchip_saradc *info = NULL;
>>> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> struct iio_dev *indio_dev = NULL;
>>> struct resource *mem;
>>>
>>> + const struct of_device_id *match;
>>>
>>> int ret;
>>> int irq;
>>>
>>> @@ -152,6 +191,9 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)>
>>> }
>>> info = iio_priv(indio_dev);
>>>
>>> + match = of_match_device(rockchip_saradc_match, &pdev->dev);
>>> + info->data = match->data;
>>> +
>>>
>>> mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> info->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, mem);
>>> if (IS_ERR(info->regs))
>>>
>>> @@ -195,7 +237,7 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)>
>>> * Use a default of 1MHz for the converter clock.
>>> * This may become user-configurable in the future.
>>> */
>>>
>>> - ret = clk_set_rate(info->clk, 1000000);
>>> + ret = clk_set_rate(info->clk, info->data->clk_rate);
>>>
>>> if (ret < 0) {
>>>
>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to set adc clk rate, %d\n", ret);
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> @@ -227,8 +269,8 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)>
>>> indio_dev->info = &rockchip_saradc_iio_info;
>>> indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
>>>
>>> - indio_dev->channels = rockchip_saradc_iio_channels;
>>> - indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(rockchip_saradc_iio_channels);
>>> + indio_dev->channels = info->data->channels;
>>> + indio_dev->num_channels = info->data->num_channels;
>>>
>>> ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev);
>>> if (ret)
>>>
>>> @@ -296,12 +338,6 @@ static int rockchip_saradc_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>
>>> static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(rockchip_saradc_pm_ops,
>>>
>>> rockchip_saradc_suspend, rockchip_saradc_resume);
>>>
>>> -static const struct of_device_id rockchip_saradc_match[] = {
>>> - { .compatible = "rockchip,saradc" },
>>> - {},
>>> -};
>>> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_saradc_match);
>>> -
>>>
>>> static struct platform_driver rockchip_saradc_driver = {
>>>
>>> .probe = rockchip_saradc_probe,
>>> .remove = rockchip_saradc_remove,
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-09-10 21:41    [W:2.950 / U:0.584 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site