Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Aug 2014 21:31:05 +0530 | Subject | Re: Request to include Mailbox tree in linux-next | From | Jassi Brar <> |
| |
On 8 August 2014 21:28, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi Jassi, > > On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 20:40:47 +0530 Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On 8 August 2014 20:11, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> >> Upon Mark's suggestion (and the right thing to do) I wanted the patchset >> >> to live the cycle in linux-next. >> > >> > Yes, that's the right thing to do, but you sent the request at an >> > inappropriate time. The correct time to send your request would be >> > after 3.17-rc1 has been released, IOW after the current merge window >> > is over. >> > >> > In general, kernel developers don't "remember" requests from one week >> > to the next; instead, we much prefer people send their requests at the >> > appropriate times in the development cycle. >> > >> OK, thanks for explaining. > > As Russell has said, if you remind me after -rc1 is out, I will add > your tree then. I will try to remember, but don't depend on it. > Please don't bother. I will remind you then.
Thanks Jassi
| |