Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 8 Aug 2014 19:55:52 +0530 | Subject | Re: Request to include Mailbox tree in linux-next | From | Jassi Brar <> |
| |
On 8 August 2014 09:59, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi Jassi, > > On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 12:25:49 +0530 Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> The framework for Mailbox has undergone 10 revisions over the last >> one year, which has garnered support in the form of 'Reviewed-by' and >> 'looks good enough to be merged in this window' from people in the CC >> list. >> >> Could you please add it to linux-next? >> Tree: git://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/fujitsu/integration.git >> Branch: mailbox-for-3.17 >> Contact: Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> > > This is really late for v3.17. The purpose of linux-next is to > discover interactions between trees before they are pulled into Linus' > tree and to do some cross architecture build checking. Adding a tree > during the merge window is not very helpful to that. > > However if this is really going to be merged by Linus before v3.17-rc1, > I will add it on Monday, OK? > The patchset was deemed ready enough for this merge window. However some late nitpicks and bikeshedding discussions ate time and my confidence to send a pull request to Linus. Upon Mark's suggestion (and the right thing to do) I wanted the patchset to live the cycle in linux-next. Sorry, I messed up by calling it for-3.17. It should have been for-3.18.
Regards, -Jassi
| |