Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: checkpatch.pl report about "Missing blank line after declarations" in a structure definition | From | Joe Perches <> | Date | Mon, 04 Aug 2014 08:11:15 -0700 |
| |
On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 14:50 +0000, Dotan Barak wrote: > I think that allowing a prefix is reasonable (to allow modules to add more flexibility). > I tried the suggested change and it still didn't work for me. > > The following change worked for me: > (?:$Storage\s+)?[A-Z0-9_]*(?:DECLARE|DEFINE)_[A-Z_]*\s*\(| > > But, maybe it is better to be even more general and allow: > (?:$Storage\s+)?[A-Z0-9_]*(?:DECLARE|DEFINE)_[ A-Z0-9_]*\s*\(|
Maybe:
(?:$Storage\s+)(?:[A-Z_][A-Z0-9]+_){0,2}(?:DEFINE|DECLARE)(?:_[A-Z0-9]+){1,2}
| |