lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Solved the Xen PV/KASLR riddle
On 29.08.2014 16:08, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 08:01:43PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
>>>> So not much further... but then I think I know what I do next. Probably should
>>>> have done before. I'll replace the WARN_ON in vmalloc that triggers by a panic
>>>> and at least get a crash dump of that situation when it occurs. Then I can dig
>>>> in there with crash (really should have thought of that before)...
>>>
>>> <nods> I dug a bit in the code (arch/x86/xen/mmu.c) but there is nothing there
>>> that screams at me, so I fear I will have to wait until you get the crash
>>> and get some clues from that.
>>
>> Ok, what a journey. So after long hours of painful staring at the code...
>> (and btw, if someone could tell me how the heck one can do a mfn_to_pfn
>> in crash, I really would appreaciate :-P)
>>
>> So at some point I realized that level2_fixmap_pgt seemed to contain
>> an oddly high number of entries (given that the virtual address that
>> failed would be mapped by entry 0). And suddenly I realized that apart
>> from entries 506 and 507 (actual fixmap and vsyscalls) the whole list
>> actually was the same as level2_kernel_gpt (without the first 16M
>> cleared).
>>
>> And then I realized that xen_setup_kernel_pagetable is wrong to a
>> degree which makes one wonder how this ever worked. Adding PMD_SIZE
>> as an offset (2M) isn't changing l2 at all. This just copies Xen's
>> kernel mapping, AGAIN!.
>>
>> I guess we all just were lucky that in most cases modules would not
>> use more than 512M (which is the correctly cleaned up remainder
>> of kernel_level2_pgt)..
>>
>> I still need to compile a kernel with the patch and the old layout
>> but I kind of got exited by the find. At least this is tested with
>> the 1G/~1G layout and it comes up without vmalloc errors.
>
> Woot!

Oh yeah! :)

>>
>> -Stefan
>>
>> >From 4b9a9a45177284e29d345eb54c545bd1da718e1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
>> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 19:17:00 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] x86/xen: Fix setup of 64bit kernel pagetables
>>
>> This seemed to be one of those what-the-heck moments. When trying to
>> figure out why changing the kernel/module split (which enabling KASLR
>> does) causes vmalloc to run wild on boot of 64bit PV guests, after
>> much scratching my head, found that the current Xen code copies the
>
> s/current Xen/xen_setup_kernel_pagetable/

ok

>
>> same L2 table not only to the level2_ident_pgt and level2_kernel_pgt,
>> but also (due to miscalculating the offset) to level2_fixmap_pgt.
>>
>> This only worked because the normal kernel image size only covers the
>> first half of level2_kernel_pgt and module space starts after that.
>> With the split changing, the kernel image uses the full PUD range of
>> 1G and module space starts in the level2_fixmap_pgt. So basically:
>>
>> L4[511]->level3_kernel_pgt[510]->level2_kernel_pgt
>> [511]->level2_fixmap_pgt
>>
>
> Perhaps you could add a similar drawing of what it looked like
> without the kaslr enabled? AS in the 'normal kernel image' scenario?

Sure. Btw, someone also contacted me saying they have the same problem without
changing the layout but having really big initrd (500M). While that feels like
it should be impossible (if the kernel+initrd+xen stuff has to fix the 512M
kernel image size area then). But if it can happen, then surely it does cause
mappings to be where the module space starts then.

>
>> And now the incorrect copy of the kernel mapping in that range bites
>> (hard).
>
> Want to include the vmalloc warning you got?

Yeah, that is a good idea.

>
>>
>> This change might not be the fully correct approach as it basically
>> removes the pre-set page table entry for the fixmap that is compile
>> time set (level2_fixmap_pgt[506]->level1_fixmap_pgt). For one the
>> level1 page table is not yet declared in C headers (that might be
>> fixed). But also with the current bug, it was removed, too. Since
>> the Xen mappings for level2_kernel_pgt only covered kernel + initrd
>> and some Xen data this did never reach that far. And still, something
>> does create entries at level2_fixmap_pgt[506..507]. So it should be
>> ok. At least I was able to successfully boot a kernel with 1G kernel
>> image size without any vmalloc whinings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
>> index e8a1201..803034c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
>> @@ -1902,8 +1902,22 @@ void __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long max_pfn)
>> /* L3_i[0] -> level2_ident_pgt */
>> convert_pfn_mfn(level3_ident_pgt);
>> /* L3_k[510] -> level2_kernel_pgt
>> - * L3_i[511] -> level2_fixmap_pgt */
>> + * L3_k[511] -> level2_fixmap_pgt */
>> convert_pfn_mfn(level3_kernel_pgt);
>> +
>> + /* level2_fixmap_pgt contains a single entry for the
>> + * fixmap area at offset 506. The correct way would
>> + * be to convert level2_fixmap_pgt to mfn and set the
>> + * level1_fixmap_pgt (which is completely empty) to RO,
>> + * too. But currently this page table is not delcared,
>
> declared.
>> + * so it would be a bit of voodoo to get its address.
>> + * And also the fixmap entry was never set anyway due
>
> s/anyway//

Too much slang I guess. Ok :)

>> + * to using the wrong l2 when getting Xen's tables.
>> + * So let's just nuke it.
>> + * This orphans level1_fixmap_pgt, but that should be
>> + * as it always has been.
>
> 'as it always has been.' ? Not sure I follow that sentence?

Probably need to be more verbose and say "the same basically happens with the
current code, too".

>
>> + */
>> + memset(level2_fixmap_pgt, 0, 512*sizeof(long));
>> }
>> /* We get [511][511] and have Xen's version of level2_kernel_pgt */
>> l3 = m2v(pgd[pgd_index(__START_KERNEL_map)].pgd);
>> @@ -1913,21 +1927,15 @@ void __init xen_setup_kernel_pagetable(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long max_pfn)
>> addr[1] = (unsigned long)l3;
>> addr[2] = (unsigned long)l2;
>> /* Graft it onto L4[272][0]. Note that we creating an aliasing problem:
>> - * Both L4[272][0] and L4[511][511] have entries that point to the same
>> + * Both L4[272][0] and L4[511][510] have entries that point to the same
>> * L2 (PMD) tables. Meaning that if you modify it in __va space
>> * it will be also modified in the __ka space! (But if you just
>> * modify the PMD table to point to other PTE's or none, then you
>> * are OK - which is what cleanup_highmap does) */
>> copy_page(level2_ident_pgt, l2);
>> - /* Graft it onto L4[511][511] */
>> + /* Graft it onto L4[511][510] */
>> copy_page(level2_kernel_pgt, l2);
>>
>> - /* Get [511][510] and graft that in level2_fixmap_pgt */
>> - l3 = m2v(pgd[pgd_index(__START_KERNEL_map + PMD_SIZE)].pgd);
>> - l2 = m2v(l3[pud_index(__START_KERNEL_map + PMD_SIZE)].pud);
>> - copy_page(level2_fixmap_pgt, l2);
>> - /* Note that we don't do anything with level1_fixmap_pgt which
>> - * we don't need. */
>
> Later during bootup we do set the fixmap with entries. I recall (vaguely)
> that on the SLES kernels (Classic) the fixmap was needed during early
> bootup. The reason was that it used the right away for bootparams (maybe?).

Ah ok. Yeah I was confident that it got set somewhere else after
xen_setup_kernel_pagetable ran. Because in the dump fixmap and vsyscall entries
where in place while I was pretty sure they are not set in the l2 table that is
copied in from the pagetables provided by the xen toolstack.

>
> I think your patch is correct in ripping out level1_fixmap_pgt
> and level2_fixmap_pgt.

l1 effectively was already ripped out (not used). The only reason I could think
of for preserving the compile-time l2 table would have been if fixmap would be
not there. But obviously that is (and was) created along with some dynamic l1 table.


Ok, I rework the patch and re-send it (freshly, iow not part of this thread).
And while I am at it, I would add the stable tag.

-Stefan

>
>> if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_auto_translated_physmap)) {
>> /* Make pagetable pieces RO */
>> set_page_prot(init_level4_pgt, PAGE_KERNEL_RO);
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>


[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-08-29 16:41    [W:0.134 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site