Messages in this thread | | | From | "Zheng, Lv" <> | Subject | RE: kernel boot fail with efi earlyprintk (bisected) | Date | Mon, 25 Aug 2014 06:34:02 +0000 |
| |
Hi,
> From: Dave Young [mailto:dyoung@redhat.com] > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 2:07 PM > To: Matt Fleming > Cc: Zheng, Lv; Fleming, Matt; linux-efi@vger.kernel.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@acpica.org; > lenb@kernel.org; Wysocki, Rafael J; Moore, Robert > Subject: Re: kernel boot fail with efi earlyprintk (bisected) > > On 08/22/14 at 06:02pm, Dave Young wrote: > > On 08/21/14 at 09:52pm, Matt Fleming wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Aug, at 04:16:58PM, Dave Young wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > 3.16 kernel boot fail with earlyprintk=efi on my laptop. > > > > It keeps scrolling at the bottom line of screen. > > > > > > > > Bisected, the first bad commit is below: > > > > commit 86dfc6f339886559d80ee0d4bd20fe5ee90450f0 > > > > Author: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> > > > > Date: Fri Apr 4 12:38:57 2014 +0800 > > > > > > > > ACPICA: Tables: Fix table checksums verification before installation. > > > > > > > > > > > > I did some debugging by enabling both serial and efi earlyprintk, below is > > > > some debug dmesg, seems early_ioremap fails in scroll up function due to > > > > no free slot, but I'm still not sure if the debug info is right or not. > > > > > > Thanks Dave, your callstack seems to make sense. > > > > > > Can you also enable early_ioremap_debug so that we can figure out where > > > all the FIXMAP slots are going? > > > > With early_ioremap_debug enabled, there will be a lot of "dropped printk", so > > I can not get any useful information. > > > > Will try to do more debug. > > early_ioremap_debug does not work because we are debugging early_printk but > early_ioremap_debug itself will print warning message at the same time. > > Tried what Lv mentioned, increasing the early ioremap slots does help.
Could you send a tested patch to linux-acpi@vger.kermel.org for this? I think the number of early mapping slots need to be increased by 1 because of this case.
Thanks and best regards -Lv
| |