lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Aug]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3 0/6] namespaces: log namespaces per task
On 14/05/20, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> On 14/05/20, Eric Paris wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-05-20 at 09:12 -0400, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> > > The purpose is to track namespaces in use by logged processes from the
> > > perspective of init_*_ns.

(Including the Linux API list due to the additions to /proc/<pid>/ns/.
Please see http://www.kernelhub.org/?p=2&msg=477668 and in particular
http://www.kernelhub.org/?msg=477678&p=2 )

<snip>

> > > 5/6 provides an example of usage for audit_log_task_info() which is used by
> > > syscall audits, among others. audit_log_task() and audit_common_recv_message()
> > > would be other potential use cases.
> > >
> > > Proposed output format:
> > > This differs slightly from Aristeu's patch because of the label conflict with
> > > "pid=" due to including it in existing records rather than it being a seperate
> > > record. The serial numbers are printed in hex.
> > > type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1399651071.433:72): arch=c000003e syscall=272 success=yes exit=0 a0=40000000 a1=ffffffffffffffff a2=0 a3=22 items=0 ppid=1 pid=483 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="(t-daemon)" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" netns=97 utsns=2 ipcns=1 pidns=4 userns=3 mntns=5 subj=system_u:system_r:init_t:s0 key=(null)
> >
> > I'm undecided if I'd rather see this as a separate NS_INFO record type.
> > It would mean we could filter them out of the logs...
>
> I don't have a strong opinion either way. Steve G.'s opinion would be
> helpful here.

Breaking this out into a seperate record type would mean calling
audit_log_namespace_info() from the callers of audit_log_task_info()
(presently audit_log_link_denied(), ima_audit_measurement(),
audit_log_exit() ), but would make it easier to emit with other record
types.

> > Do we print out lots of pidns=0 for tasks not in a newly created NS? Do
> > we want to?
>
> There is no "pidns=0", but I understand your point. This would come
> back to Steve G.'s point about disappearing fields, and the value of
> having it as a seperate record that could be filtered.
>
> > > 6/6 tracks the creation and deletion of of namespaces, listing the type of
> > > namespace instance, related namespace id if there is one and the newly minted
> > > serial number.
> > >
> > > Proposed output format:
> > > type=NS_INIT msg=audit(1400217435.706:94): pid=524 uid=0 auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:mount_t:s0 type=20000 old_snum=0 snum=a1 res=1
> >
> > I'd love to be able to grep for netns=20 and find both the NS_INIT and
> > the SYSCALL/NS_INFO records, instead of having them named different
> > things. So basically I think you want to translate the type= into a
> > string for the old_X= and X=...
>
> That actually makes a bit more sense, and we could do away with the
> "type=" field since the "Xns=" fields are self-describing.

Steve, how do you feel about this since the NS_INIT/NS_DEL record type
would have changing fields amongst the 6 namespace types. Only one of
the 6 would be present in each message. I suppose we could have an
NS_INIT_XXX/NS_DEL_XXX for each namespace type.

> - RGB

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <rbriggs@redhat.com>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat
Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-08-19 19:21    [W:0.105 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site