[lkml]   [2014]   [Aug]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: BUG: early intel microcode update violating alignment rules
I don't think so.  I wouldn't count on that in the long run.

I'm having some discussions about this integrally at the moment.

On August 11, 2014 11:18:32 AM PDT, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <> wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 11, 2014, at 11:51, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> We could put a buffer in the initdata region (we really could use an
>> initbss region!) or in the brk.
>That sounds much better than the hideous crap I came up with. The
>buffer would need to be at least 64KiB in size to be on the safe side.
>The largest public microcode update ATM is 23KiB.
>I am not sure if we might need more than 64KiB: the Intel SDM mentions
>that in real mode the update data must not cross a segment boundary,
>also must not exceed a segment limit. I am a bit rusty on real mode,
>but doesn't that mean, in practice, that microcode update data size is
>limited in size to 64KiB?

Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-08-11 21:21    [W:0.059 / U:13.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site