Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 1 Aug 2014 19:26:56 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv10 0/4] Common Mailbox Framework |
| |
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 05:59:54PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: > Hello, > Here's v10. Not much different from v9. The code and the generic > bindings looked good enough to relevant gods, but the patchset still > needs some formal loving in the form of Acked-by's. > > Changes since v9: > o Purely cosmetic changes - added headers and used BIT()
Given that this code is now getting very stable can I suggest setting up a git tree and making sure it's included in -next? Just send Stephen a mail with a pointer to the relevant tree and branch and ask him to add it.
I'd say it's probably worth merging at this point though since it's not been in -next yet and the merge window is likely to open this weekend it might be a bit much to try to merge it this window. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |