Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Jul 2014 13:26:34 -0700 | Subject | Re: a case for a common efuse API? | From | Olof Johansson <> |
| |
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> I added Tegra folks because I see that on Tegra this hardware is exposed > via an SoC specific API, tegra_fuse_readl(), and an associated driver in > drivers/misc/fuse/tegra/. Unfortunately I don't see any users of the API > outside of the speedo code in the same directory and the sysfs bin > attribute that may or may not be in use by some userspace code.
Note that I also turned down the pull request that houses the code under drivers/misc.
This is the type of stuff we've been talking about needing a home for somewhere, and drivers/soc was one of the ones mentioned for that. I really don't like adding dependencies on a random driver from platform code, for example.
-Olof
| |