lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: a case for a common efuse API?
From
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:

> I added Tegra folks because I see that on Tegra this hardware is exposed
> via an SoC specific API, tegra_fuse_readl(), and an associated driver in
> drivers/misc/fuse/tegra/. Unfortunately I don't see any users of the API
> outside of the speedo code in the same directory and the sysfs bin
> attribute that may or may not be in use by some userspace code.

Note that I also turned down the pull request that houses the code
under drivers/misc.

This is the type of stuff we've been talking about needing a home for
somewhere, and drivers/soc was one of the ones mentioned for that. I
really don't like adding dependencies on a random driver from platform
code, for example.


-Olof


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-07-09 03:21    [W:0.120 / U:0.260 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site